Clinical evaluation of a new flossing device
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a new device in interproximal plaque removal as compared to handheld floss. The study was divided into two phases. Phase I involved 36 dental students and phase II involved periodontal patients on supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). Clinical parameters assessed included gingival index and plaque index from mesial and distal surfaces, buccal and lingual. Each phase was divided into two groups: group A, in which patients were given instructions on toothbrushing (TB) and floss device; and group B, with TB instructions and handheld floss. Patients were instructed to brush twice daily and floss once daily. A questionnaire on compliance was given to the patients at the end of the sixth week. At baseline there was no difference in groups A and B in phase I. Group A in phase II had lower GI than group B. At six weeks there was no statistically significant difference in GI or PI between the handheld or floss device for either phase. Both phases showed decreases in GI and PI. The questionnaire showed compliance and no trauma. The floss device (Floss Plus) was as effective as handheld floss. Students preferred handheld floss to the device. SPT patients preferred the floss device. [c.c.]
Pucher, J., P. Jayaprakash, T. Aftyka, L. Sigman, and R. Swol, Quint Internat, 26:273, 1995